Choosing Uzi for kids|Å velge Uzi som barne-våpen

[fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”][lang_en]Soldiers in warThe tragic death of an 8 year old boy in Connecticut provoke me, why did his father chose an Uzi? It is well known that other machine guns like AK-74, AK-47, AG-3 and M16 are much more suitable for children because they have longer barrels.

Armies are also giving these to kids because they are easy to strip, reassemble and they are fairly easy and safe to use. This is common knowledge among armies that use children in war, in Cambodia, Sri-Lanka, Ethiopia, Angola, Mozambique, El Salvador and Peru – so I don’t understand why Connecticut chooses Uzi. When the short barrelled gun recoils the gun mostly moves upwards and if the user does not let go of the trigger the weapon will continue until it points at the user. All kids with weapon knows this. Why not the people in Connecticut?

Its very sad for this kid and his family, my thoughts go to them. But we all should respect that this is the way of life, in Connecticut.

Link to the murder.
DB : Dagbladet.

Följ min blogg med bloggkoll
[/lang_en]
[/fusion_builder_column][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”][lang_nb-no]
Soldiers in warDet tragiske dødsfallet i Connecticut hvor en 8 år gammel gutt skjøt seg selv ved et uhell med en Uzi provoserer meg. Hvorfor valgte faren en Uzi? Det er godt kjent at maskingevær som AK-74, AK-47, AG-3 og M-16 er mye mer egnet som våpen til barn.

Hærer bruker disse istedet for Uzi fordi de er lett å demontere, sette sammen igjen og de er forsåvidt ganske enkel og sikker å bruke. Dette er velkjent stoff for hærer med barn i krig, I Kambodia, Sri-Lanka, Etiopia, Angola, Mozambique, El Salvador, Peru og mange andre steder – så jeg forstår ikke hvorfor Connecticut velger Uzi. Uzien har et ganske kraftig rekyl, og når løpet er så kort går den fort oppover. Slipper ikke barnet triggeren så fortsetter våpenet å avfyre til den er tom eller brukere død. Alle barn med våpen vet slike ting, hvorfor ikke i Connecticut?

Det er trist for denne gutten og hans familie, men vi må alle huske på at sånn er livet – i Connecticut.

Link til mordet.
DB : Dagbladet.

Följ min blogg med bloggkoll
[/lang_nb-no]
[/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

Øyvind Lasse Høysæter

Born in 1971, fell in love with computing in 1983 because of Sinclair's masterpieces. Continued on the magic surrounding the C64, Amiga and moved to the PC world in 1990. Loves science fiction, programming, astronomy, my family and my job. (developer) :)

You may also like...

2 Responses

  1. Almir Bojkovic sier:

    really interesting that such countries are giving weapons to such kids. The sad thing is that they eventually only know how to use weapons and grow up becoming ruthless killers

  2. Margaret sier:

    I can’t believe this happened in Connecticut either! You could understand if it were Arkansas, West Virginia or Alabama — heck even Georgia, Tennessee or South Carolina!

    ê¿ê

Legg igjen en kommentar

Din e-postadresse vil ikke bli publisert. Obligatoriske felt er merket med *

Dette nettstedet bruker Akismet for å redusere spam. Lær om hvordan dine kommentar-data prosesseres.